[OSM-talk-be] Association/Veriniging OpenStreetMap Belgium ? (very soon ?)

[Julien Fastré]

I made my proposals on the talk page: it may be easier...

Should we organize vote ?

Julien




Le 11/10/12 14:53, eMerzh a écrit :
> about the  bylaws published i have some comments but should i set them
> on the wiki (discussion? ) or here?
>
> like the "Object de l'assoc.. " (art 3.1 ) ..  we need to be more OSM specific .
> I like the opendata mouvement but OSM-belgium is about OSM ..; if we
> can in the process give access to other opendata , great!
>
> We may look on the French version to have good idea ...
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_France/Projet_d%27association_en_France/Statuts
>
> There, the object is :
>
>
> L’objectif de l’association est de promouvoir le projet OpenStreetMap
> et notamment la collecte, la diffusion et l'utilisation de données
> cartographiques sous des licences libres. Le règlement intérieur liste
> les licences libres applicables aux données géographiques
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Julien Fastré <julien at fastre.info> wrote:
>> Ok. +1 for me.
>>
>> Until now, we have never heard on this list the proposal to have 2
>> organisations.
>>
>> Thinking about that, I was imagined also a possibility to have two
>> organisations with a representation of the other one in the board of each
>> one... But for thoses people, it means having to keep beeing up to date of
>> two asbl/vzw...
>>
>> about the question: "what to do in this asbl" and "what to do with the
>> money", i thought about such things:
>>
>> - organising some mapping parties and events and communicate about it (to
>> let know OSM) ;
>> - let do some research by universities about open data, or ask them to make
>> a review of licence we will maybe discuss with administration ;
>> - be present at some places (REWICS in Wallonia, salon des enseignants (?),
>> ...) ;
>> - and do a lot of lobbying in favour of osm by municipalities,
>> administrations, etc.
>> - ...
>>
>> About the bylaws published yesterday : do you agree about the proposals ?
>>
>> For me, we should have only two category of members :
>> - membres adhérents : all contributors who may justify to be registered on
>> OSM since two months ;
>> - membres effectifs : members accepted by the board (this is the case in the
>> french association) ;
>>
>> I do not see the utility of honoured members and "membres bienfaiteurs"
>>
>> Of course, other organisation personnes morales are accepted as members.
>>
>> Julien
>>
>> Le 11/10/12 14:08, Jo a écrit :
>>
>> My vote goes to 1 organisation (until we split the country, lol, just
>> kidding). I don't see a problem with only having the bylaws in 1 language,
>> even if it is French :-).
>>
>> Jo
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/10/11 eMerzh <merzhin at gmail.com>
>>> I can help too... (i live in brussels)
>>>
>>> The first thing to choose is if we do 2 or 1 organisation (with maybe
>>> regional points)
>>>
>>> Then we need to discuss the object of the association ...
>>>
>>> and i think we need to become a real "local chapter" to be able to use
>>> osm logo / ...
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-be mailing list
>>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be