[OSM-talk-be] My first attempt at a boundary

[Glenn Plas]

Pretty heavy when you filter this one for belgium:

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1J0

Glenn

On 08-12-13 09:11, Marc Gemis wrote:
> for those that want to keep track of which postal_code areas are 
> already defined: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1IE
>
> this is a simple overpass query. there are better ways to do this, 
> e.g. restrict the query to Belgium instead of the current bounding 
> box, or creating a separate map with the postal code areas as overlay.
>
> regards
>
> m
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Kurt Roeckx <kurt at roeckx.be 
> <mailto:kurt at roeckx.be>> wrote:
>
>     On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 11:26:27PM +0100, Jo wrote:
>     > I haven't worked on boundaries before, but this discussion
>     triggered it.
>     >
>     > So I added boundary=postal_code relations for 3000, 3001, 3010,
>     3012 and
>     > 3018 and since I had to split the boundary of Groot-Leuven, I
>     went all
>     > around it to align it more on AGIV WMS imagery.
>
>     I fixed some of those boundaries and added some admin_level 9
>     boundaries for it too, but some are still broken.  Will try to
>     fix the rest tomorrow.
>
>
>     Kurt
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Talk-be mailing list
>     Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20131208/9cf1ac68/attachment.htm>