[OSM-talk-be] Maas/La Meuse disappearing...
Julien Fastré
julien at fastre.info
Fri Jan 4 12:35:11 UTC 2013
Hi,
The guy split a outer-way into two parts, convert one parts to a road,
and did not add the old part to the multipolygon. So, this was not
closed any more.
I did my best : http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14524952
It seems ok now (http://analyser.openstreetmap.fr/cgi-bin/index.py -
relation id : 49588) although it does not appears on the mapnik layer
(OpenMapquest does)
I am going to write to llnoxll this afternoon.
Julien
Le 04/01/13 13:22, Ben Laenen a écrit :
> On Friday 04 January 2013 13:09:02 Jan-willem De Bleser wrote:
>> Just keep an eye on them, as Julien has done, and teach the new users about
>> relations as needed. The larger multipolygon is a more accurate
>> representation, as long as we don't have a proper area data type.
> It's not really more accurate, as we don't have a one to one mapping from real
> life objects to OSM objects. Our roads for example are also often split up
> into many pieces. And by breaking up a huge object into manageable parts you
> can more easily repair it when someone does something wrong, which still
> matters because we don't have a review process so we can intervene before the
> bad edit is uploaded.
>
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list