[OSM-talk-be] Addresses in Belgium

[Joren]

Op 07-01-13 11:21, Jan-willem De Bleser schreef:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:
>> @Jan-Willem: I wouldn't take away the addr:street from the houses and POIs
>> when you add them to an associatedStreet relation. I tried that once, a few
>> years ago, and had to revert because portable editors didn't support
>> relations (and they still don't) and, when in the field, people are missing
>> that information then. So it's probably best to keep that redundancy in the
>> data.
> I find that very dangerous, and would rather people added only
> addr:street tags than both. What if I incorrectly add an
> associatedStreet, and then a mobile mapper adds the correct
> addr:street tag - who should the end users then believe? Or if I add
> the correct relation, and a vandal a wrong addr:street tag?
>
> You know, seeing as the street already has the name, why is the name
> repeated in associatedStreet at all?
I agree for a consistent tagging... Now I don't know what's the best 
street-tag for a building... is a relation better than an addr:street tag?

Joren