[OSM-talk-be] Firefighters and OSM + fire_hydrant
Glenn Plas
glenn at byte-consult.be
Fri Jul 26 00:34:24 UTC 2013
On 2013-07-25 21:29, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:16:14AM +0200, Teddy wrote:
>> 2013/7/24 Kurt Roeckx <kurt at roeckx.be>
>>
>>> fire_hydrant
>>
>>
>> Hello Kurt,
>> No, there are 3 numbers for the offset, in the tag "fire_hydrant:position"
> On the signs there are only ever 2 of those numbers. Either you
> one to the left or one to the right. Never both.
>
> Anyway, I see no point in mapping that a sign says the hydrant
> that much away from the sign. Those numbers are their for people
> who are looking for the hydrant to find by saying about where they
> should look. In my expieriences they're also not very accurate.
>
It would make sense with hidden ones and a smartphone application to
find them using OSM data. If you know what to look for _and_ where, you
are all set.
But in the end it doesn't matter, I really didn't forsee that by copying
a key from the severly micromapped Rossleben a discussion of this kind
would erupt. In the end, it's probably bad tagging, values like that
deserve their own keys. But the same thing can be said about a tree,
why would you map a tree? only reason I know is to make it a landmark.
I do this sometimes as this can help recognizing distinct areas.
Sometimes the application of those things is beyond our imagination.
Things like this emerge nowadays :
http://eprints.nuim.ie/2482/1/Ciepluch-et-al-ACM-GIS-CamerReady1.pdf
Using OSM data to determine location without GPS, just by using vector
data. I can imagine an application (google glasses ?) that could do
wicked things using this.
But in the end, it's only a sign. But it would be not against OSM
spirit, e.g. To map what is there in the real world. Mapping the
hydrant is much more important. Eventually the lat/lon on that, if
precise enough is exactly the location, so in essence, we would be using
a different positioning system in an existing one.
So , eventually it's not all that important to do, and I would not have
a problem to drop those from the ones I made.
Glenn
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list