[OSM-talk-be] Postalcode 12 in Rumst - Fixed

[Marc Gemis]

I'll try again with associated street on Sas or Dijkstraat, Bornem and let
you know my findings. At this moment they return 9140 instead of 2880
(Bornem).
I'll do one with postal code and the other with associated street.

m.


On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Glenn Plas <glenn at byte-consult.be> wrote:

>  On 06/11/2013 12:31 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> The postal_code tag on the street is taken into account almost
> immediately. Even after several days, the one on associated street does not
> work.I know that somewhere you can see the backlog of nominatim, but forgot
> where.
>
>  The FAQ does not mention associatedStreet:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/FAQ
>
>  I don't know how to add a post code as polygon (as mentioned in the
> FAQ). I've tried with placing it on an administrative boundary (Rumst), but
> that did not help for the "12".
> The is_in worked for some streets in Hombeek (was using the postcode from
> Zemst on some, but not all street), but did not work for the ones in
> Hingene.
>
>  When you dig deeper into Nominatim, the output of
> http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=40331960 might
> become clearer, but I don't understand all of it (yet).
>
>  m
>
> Try this link:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/Development_overview#Postcodes
>
> Sure mentions the AssociatedStreet relation.  That's why this surprises me.
>
> Glenn
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130611/51055f8d/attachment.htm>