[OSM-talk-be] Postalcode 12 in Rumst - Fixed

[Marc Gemis]

where can I log this bug ? (I'm too lazy to look it up :-)  )


m.


On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:

> It seems weird to me to add postal codes to streets. It's a good thing you
> found out that this helps nominatim, but now a bug needs to be reported, so
> they can change this erratic behaviour in their code. Otherwise we'll all
> be mapping for nominatim soon.
>
> Jo
>
>
> 2013/6/11 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>
>
>> I just did the test. Immediately after uploading, the DIjkstraat got
>> postcode 2880 (search Nominatim). Sas not yet. They were uploading in the
>> same changeset : http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16512278
>>
>> Sas is done with an associatedStreet with addr:postcode 2880, Dijkstraat
>> with postal_code 2880 on the street itself
>>
>> feel free to try "Sas, Bornem" anytime to see whether it updated
>>
>> Then I also tried adding addr:postcode 2880 on house nr 2 in Sas. I
>> thought that in the past it updated rather quickly when I did this, but not
>> this time.
>>
>> changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16512343
>>
>> m
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Glenn Plas <glenn at byte-consult.be>wrote:
>>
>>>  On 06/11/2013 03:01 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll try again with associated street on Sas or Dijkstraat, Bornem and
>>> let you know my findings. At this moment they return 9140 instead of 2880
>>> (Bornem).
>>> I'll do one with postal code and the other with associated street.
>>>
>>>  m.
>>>
>>> It will be interesting to see what the outcome of that little test will
>>> be.
>>>
>>> btw, I've been fixing some postal codes too on roads across the border
>>> between zemst and mechelen, I decide based on AGIV data.  I've notices some
>>> roads had the correct name (either on the relation or on it's own) but the
>>> wrong postal code (hence also the name).
>>>
>>> The borders there are a not entirely accurate, for example Boterstraat
>>> and Kleine Parijsstraat.  See
>>> http://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=14&lat=50.99405&lon=4.44663&layers=BTT&user=Glenn%20Plas&age=6%20month
>>>
>>> When checking with AGIV, you cannot find Boterstraat in zemst but you
>>> can in hombeek (Mechelen).   Sometimes they exist in both of course, not
>>> these 2 though.
>>>
>>> One other thing, I noticed a lot of people use source=wikipedia , which
>>> is our duty to add,  but at that moment also consider adding more detail
>>> using key wikipedia=<language:Page>.
>>>
>>> Take a look at this node
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/106946183
>>> having wikipedia=nl:Chiro set.
>>>
>>> Links on the subject are http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikipediaand
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia  for more
>>> information.  You can click through vast amounts of docs there on how this
>>> is used.   It's widely supported on software presenting OSM data, but that
>>> only has about 120000 of those currently in it.
>>>
>>> Check out http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WIWOSM if you are
>>> interested in details.
>>>
>>> there is a plugin as well :
>>> http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Plugin/Wikipedia
>>>
>>> Glenn
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-be mailing list
>>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130611/87919c89/attachment.htm>