[OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries
Glenn Plas
glenn at byte-consult.be
Fri Jun 14 10:48:31 UTC 2013
Maybe it's me but I cannot find any administrative boundary concerning
Werchter inside Rotselaar.
Also removed a highway crossing tag from Leuven boundary[7].
So it's possible the search fails due to this fact.
Glenn
On 06/14/2013 12:38 PM, Glenn Plas wrote:
> The fact that Rotselaar trickles up into Leuven can be explained
> according to the current data:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/143580669
>
> Still looking into that search problem..
>
> Glenn
>
> On 06/14/2013 12:17 PM, Daan Bellefroid wrote:
>> Beginners question:
>>
>> In Nominatim: the search "Leybos, Werchter" gives no results. The
>> search "Leybos, Rotselaar" does.
>>
>> Is this normal behaviour? Of course Werchter is a sub-administration
>> of Rotselaar.
>>
>> Is it so that boundaries are set as "the bigger one wins"?
>>
>> Further, Rotselaar seems to be incorporated into Leuven although the
>> two have nothing in common.
>>
>> Maybe there exists some documentation that clearly explains and I
>> could read?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130614/fe96bf8b/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list