[OSM-talk-be] Nominatim administrative boundaries

[Daan Bellefroid]

I think that Werchter should have admin_level 9 (and not 8) as a
deelgemeente
Rotselaar is 8
And Leuven is 7. Leuven with 7 is not the city of Leuven, it is the
Arrondissement Leuven.Vlaams Brabant has 2 arrondissementen: Leuven and
Halle-Vilvoorde
Therefore Vlaams Brabant has admin_level 6.


On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Glenn Plas <glenn at byte-consult.be> wrote:

>  Kurt (a.o),
>
> I checked the Rotselaar/Werchter setup and I made a single change to the
> Rotselaar relation:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/214462
>
> The only thing I think was missing is adding the Werchter boundary
> relation as a 'subarea' to the Rotselaar one.
>
> Did the same setup for Rijmenam/Bonheiden.  There aren't many
> 'fusiegemeentes' being mapped -unfortunately- although it would be highly
> interesting to have them, not only from a nominatim (search) point of view,
> but also for addressing in general.
>
> The change I made will probably trigger some changes in the nominatim
> search result in a few days , I now expect that Leuven will be replaced by
> Rotselaar in the search result set when looking up Werchter in a few days.
>
> regards,
>
> Glenn
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130616/b5ab8734/attachment.htm>