[OSM-talk-be] historic=battlefield

[Marc Gemis]

For "bomputten" one could use historic=bomb_crater, but only when it has
some historic value (e.g. when it's marked with an information board).

I'm still under the impression that historic=battlefield  is not meant for
each individual bunker or bomb. The typical example in Belgium would be
Waterloo. The trenches in the Westhoek would also fall in this category.


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Glenn Plas <glenn at byte-consult.be> wrote:

>
>
>>>  There are also a lot of those tags around Bonheiden - Rijmenam -
>>> Keerbergen:
>>>
>>> http://geschichtskarten.openstreetmap.de/historische_objekte/?zoom=13&lat=51.00577&lon=4.56379&layers=B0000FT
>>>
>>>
>>>
> concerning these, I think this user is correct, that's the area I grew up
> in and it's packed with bunkers, the locations seem ok tool  I'm pretty
> sure some of these where battlefields.  There are places we called
> 'bomputten' , they have water in it now and are a primary place for aquatic
> life,  so I would say battlefield , most of those places definitely are,
> but as for the fact if they are historic, I'm not too sure.
>
> Glenn
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130625/7fe3ba3d/attachment.htm>