[OSM-talk-be] FW: AGIV

[EeBie]

I added the URL from the AGIV website
http://wms.agiv.be/ogc/wms/omkl?using the tab WMS/TMS in F12
Preferences.
The result is the same as Jo's long URI without the max zoom level.
The resulting is disappointing and below Bing.
I also used the old URL of het AGIV website
http://wms.agiv.be/ogc/wms/orthoklm?. In some parts the resolution is
better but not much.

Is there a chance that we can get AGIV images in JOSM in a resolution
comparable with the AGIV website?
Is somebody making contacts to realise this?

Regards,

Erik

2013/3/18 Jo <winfixit at gmail.com>

> zoom in on the area of interest on this site:
>
> http://ogc.beta.agiv.be/gdiviewer/?simple=true
>
> compare the maximum resolution after you
>
> Install a wms layer on JOSM:
>
> I used this uri, but maybe it can be 'optimised':
>
> wms[12]:
> http://wms.agiv.be/ogc/wms/omkl?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=Ortho&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}
>
>
> The 12 between [] stands for the maximum zoom level. I tried with values
> of 19, 21, 25, but it doesn't seem to have any effect. So I guess one could
> also simply omit it.
>
> I also tried to use it as tms layer, but no luck with that either.
>
> Thanks for having a look at it.
>
> It's great to have 2 imagery sources. For some places it works like a time
> machine. For others sometimes Bing is clearer, ofthen AGIV is more
> revealing, as they had the good sense to shoot pictures in wintertime, when
> there is less foliage on the trees.
> At the maximum possible resolution it would be just about perfect.
>
> Jo
>
> Op 18 maart 2013 19:18 schreef A.Pirard.Papou <A.Pirard.Papou at gmail.com>het volgende:
>
>> On 2013-03-12 08:13, Jo wrote :
>>
>>  Anderzijds is het wel wat vreemd dat wat JOSM in de WMS-laag laat zien
>>> duidelijk een lagere resolutie heeft, dan wat er op de website van AGIV
>>> zelf zichtbaar is. Het klinkt misschien wat ondankbaar, maar weten dat er
>>> betere kwaliteit beschikbaar is en het dan met minder duidelijke beelden
>>> moeten doen, is toch wat frustrerend.
>>>
>>> Het zou wel kunnen dat de URI die we gebruiken niet geoptimaliseerd is.
>>> Ik zal dit ook eens op josm-dev posten en dan vraag ik tegelijk hoe we
>>> ervoor kunnen zorgen dat JOSM deze laag zelf voorstelt aan mappers die data
>>> voor Vlaanderen afhalen/bewerken.
>>>
>>>  I may have a look if you say which are the URLs you're comparing.
>>
>> The ranter.
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-be<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130318/79f20027/attachment.htm>