[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [osmose-backend] Missing Parent Tag for all highways with bicycle = yes (#1)

[André Pirard Papou]

On 2013-03-22 21:32, Marc Gemis wrote :
> This is the reply I got on my "bug report" to osmose.
>
> Do we have to locate those ways with route=bicycle ?
>
> m

It makes no sense.
route=bicycle is a tag for a relation, not for a way.
It's very surprising that Osmose commands to repeat such a tag on ever 
cycling way !!!
How could we identify a cycling route if all the cycling ways contained 
route=bicycle ????????

Either Osmose removes that test.
Or the authors remove that tag (I bcc: one of them).
Or I can remove 28 of them that I have ready after my selection.

Your choice?

Cheers,

André.


> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *frodrigo* <notifications at github.com 
> <mailto:notifications at github.com>>
> Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [osmose-backend] Missing Parent Tag for all highways with 
> bicycle = yes (#1)
> To: osm-fr/osmose-backend <osmose-backend at noreply.github.com 
> <mailto:osmose-backend at noreply.github.com>>
> Cc: marcgemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com <mailto:marc.gemis at gmail.com>>
>
>
> "Missing parent tag" is a statistical analysis. Osmose suggest to add 
> route=bicycle because this tag value is already a key as bicycle=yes, 
> and more over because there is more than 50 ways with route=bicycle + 
> bicycle=yes in Belgium.
>
> Maybe we need to apply this analysis on relative value inside of just 50.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub 
> <https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/issues/1#issuecomment-15319079>.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130324/f6f22e23/attachment.htm>