[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [osmose-backend] Missing Parent Tag for all highways with bicycle = yes (#1)

[Frédéric Rodrigo]

 > It makes no sense.
 > route=bicycle is a tag for a relation, not for a way.
 > It's very surprising that Osmose commands to repeat such a tag on
 > ever cycling way !!!
 > How could we identify a cycling route if all the cycling ways
 > contained route=bicycle ????????

 > Osmose seems to be "rather stupid", and decides that if x number of
 > objects has certain tag combinations, all objects that have one of
 > the tags, should also have the others. It does not verify if the tag
 > is appropriate for the object (node, way, relation). But it is still
 > a valuable tool.

It's an automatic analysis based on statistical and an arbitrary trigger 
at 50 count. I can change the tigger, eg with relative value.

Error was triggered with a "parent" tag like in highway=construction and 
construction=primary.

The analysis have already a tag blacklist. I can add route=bicycle.

 > These tags were used on some ways for some routes: if a route goes
 > over a big square, an additional way is created going across the
 > square.

Really need tag on this ways ? Or add the area to route relation, or 
just no way at all.

 > and I guess osmose wouldn't like untagged ways either

Osmose report error on untagged way not part of relation (with role).

 > But I haven't found any ways with both route=bicycle and bicycle=yes
 > though.

I found lot of them here :
http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=way(%7B%7Bbbox%7D%7D)%5B%22route%22%3D%22bicycle%22%5D%5B%22bicycle%22%3D%22yes%22%5D%3B(._%3B%3E%3B)%3Bout%20meta%3B%0A&C=50.67634;4.60636;12&R

There is some choses:
- change the data
- black list route=bicycle
- use relative value on analyser to trigger at higher count.

Frédéric
Osmose analyser