[OSM-talk-be] AGIV watuning
André Pirard
A.Pirard.Papou at gmail.com
Mon Mar 25 03:10:01 UTC 2013
Hi,
Aren't these two JOSM configurations what you wanted?
Do they not work?
Aren't you satisfied?
wms:http://grb.agiv.be/geodiensten/raadpleegdiensten/geocache/?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}&LAYERS=orthoklmx
wms:http://grb.agiv.be/geodiensten/raadpleegdiensten/geocache/?FORMAT=image/png&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}&TRANSPARENT=YES&LAYERS=grb_bsk,grb_gbg,grb_sel,grb_adp
Cheers,
André.
On 2013-03-19 03:17, A.Pirard wrote :
> On 2013-03-18 19:53, Jo wrote :
>> zoom in on the area of interest on this site:
>>
>> http://ogc.beta.agiv.be/gdiviewer/?simple=true
> That viewer issues requests like this:
> http://grb.agiv.be/geodiensten/raadpleegdiensten/geocache/tms/1.0.0/orthoklm@BPL72VL/13/4828/3716.png
> (for some beta time anyway)
>
> The zoom goes up to 15, but the maximum resolution it at 13 (as shown)
> after which the server stretches the image (scales it).
> These are nonstandard zoom levels to which JOSM's zoom level should be
> adjusted.
> JOSM configuration should be
> tms:http://grb.agiv.be/geodiensten/raadpleegdiensten/geocache/tms/1.0.0/orthoklm@WGS84VL/{zoom-*z*}/{x}/{y}.png
> But I was unable to find a working *z*. That's always the problem
> with TMS when it's not standard.
> x and y could be swapped or x be bottom up, etc... A puzzle if it's
> not documented.
> The advantage of TMS is that the images (tiles) are not modified by
> the server.
>
> Anyway, the corresponding WMS configurations are:
>
> wms:http://grb.agiv.be/geodiensten/raadpleegdiensten/geocache/?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}&LAYERS=orthoklmx
>
> It seems to me to have fairly the same resolution as the viewer.
> Don't forget to right-click-change resolution on the layer, especially
> after you zoomed in.
>
> wms:http://grb.agiv.be/geodiensten/raadpleegdiensten/geocache/?FORMAT=image/png&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}&TRANSPARENT=YES&LAYERS=grb_bsk,grb_gbg,grb_sel,grb_adp
>
> png is (much) better for the grb_* and jpeg for the orthos (equivalent
> but smaller images).
> Unfortunately, the grb images are not transparent (as in Wallonie).
> I still used &TRANSPARENT=YES in case they would.
> Play with the layers' transparency if you need so.
>> compare the maximum resolution after you
>> Install a wms layer on JOSM:
>> I used this uri, but maybe it can be 'optimised':
>>
>> wms[12]:http://wms.agiv.be/ogc/wms/omkl?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=Ortho&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}
>> <http://wms.agiv.be/ogc/wms/omkl?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=Ortho&STYLES=&SRS=%7Bproj%7D&WIDTH=%7Bwidth%7D&HEIGHT=%7Bheight%7D&BBOX=%7Bbbox%7D>
>>
>> The 12 between [] stands for the maximum zoom level. I tried with
>> values of 19, 21, 25, but it doesn't seem to have any effect. So I
>> guess one could also simply omit it.
> The zoom limit prevents querying servers that return blank or error
> images when the resolution limit is exceeded.
> If you can determine the JOSM zoom level corresponding to the
> resolution limit (13 for TMS) you can use it.
> This will prevent uselessly getting stretched images from the server
> when JOSM itself can stretch them to the screen.
>> I also tried to use it as tms layer, but no luck with that either.
> Did you have the same problem as I did (no image at any speed) or another?
> Tell me how you could get TMS working, anyone.
>>
>> Thanks for having a look at it.
>>
>> It's great to have 2 imagery sources. For some places it works like a
>> time machine. For others sometimes Bing is clearer, ofthen AGIV is
>> more revealing, as they had the good sense to shoot pictures in
>> wintertime, when there is less foliage on the trees.
> It's even greater to have more ;-) All sorts of maps can help
> figuring what one sees on a photo :-)
> Beware of Bing's error offset. Always zoom out to check or... check
> with another map.
>> At the maximum possible resolution it would be just about perfect.
> I hope it will. Tell me. Have fun.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rambo.
>
>
>> Jo
>>
>> Op 18 maart 2013 19:18 schreef A.Pirard.Papou
>> <A.Pirard.Papou at gmail.com <mailto:A.Pirard.Papou at gmail.com>> het
>> volgende:
>>
>> On 2013-03-12 08:13, Jo wrote :
>>
>> Anderzijds is het wel wat vreemd dat wat JOSM in de WMS-laag
>> laat zien duidelijk een lagere resolutie heeft, dan wat er op
>> de website van AGIV zelf zichtbaar is. Het klinkt misschien
>> wat ondankbaar, maar weten dat er betere kwaliteit
>> beschikbaar is en het dan met minder duidelijke beelden
>> moeten doen, is toch wat frustrerend.
>>
>> Het zou wel kunnen dat de URI die we gebruiken niet
>> geoptimaliseerd is. Ik zal dit ook eens op josm-dev posten en
>> dan vraag ik tegelijk hoe we ervoor kunnen zorgen dat JOSM
>> deze laag zelf voorstelt aan mappers die data voor Vlaanderen
>> afhalen/bewerken.
>>
>> I may have a look if you say which are the URLs you're comparing.
>>
>> The ranter.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20130325/a5d5f0ed/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list