[OSM-talk-be] question on relation 2404021
André Pirard
A.Pirard.Papou at gmail.com
Sun Nov 3 00:00:34 UTC 2013
On 2013-11-02 23:04, marc bessieres wrote :
> Hello,
>
> After starting updating the wiki on quality assurance tools. I spent
> some time correcting the issues in Brussels.
> Now I start finding issues I don't have enough knowledge to fix alone.
> I assume it is better to send a mail per issue, so I start here with:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/240402
>
> There is a FIXME in it before its boundaries are not complete.
>
> For me it looks a lot like:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/58274
>
> which has a complete boundary.
> But one is Bruxelles, and the other is Ville de Bruxelles.
>
> I must admit I don't understand the differences.
>
> My idea would be to merge the extra data of the former into the
> latter. And remove the former.
> But as they are each in the relation of the other I may miss something
> or someone would have done the merge already, so here I am asking for
> a piece of advice.
>
> What should be done with:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/240402
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Marc
>
You should certainly not delete anything before you have fully
understood the very complicated administrative structures of our country
;-) You may notice that we have two Belgiums.
Notice that those boundaries are administrative level 8 and level 9,
certainly not the same thing and that doing as you say is destroying.
I have mapped thousands of kilometers of boundaries in Belgium and I
might have a closer look at that if you want, but not just right now.
Boundaries are complicated things.
Cheers,
André.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20131103/614daf61/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list