[OSM-talk-be] Multipolygon relation for landuse (Farmland)?

[Marc Gemis]

zors1843 is on this mailing list, so he will get in touch


m


On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Ben Abelshausen
<ben.abelshausen at gmail.com>wrote:

> Ok then let's move them out of the way. Will start doing this this evening.
>
> I also think http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/zors1843 who is great a
> landuse copied some of those practices. Does somebody know him better or is
> there someone who already sent him messages?
>
> Because when we move this to the border we should also maybe try and
> prevent similar things being manually added here?
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
> Best regards,
>
> Ben Abelshausen
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:37 PM, eMerzh <merzhin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> the CLC* things , you don't have to worry, just remove the belgian part /
>> or at least move it near the border...
>> It's an "old" import and the datas are not precise at all, if i'm correct
>> they were exctracted automatically by aerial photography (not by osm )
>> And i think in the import process they did not check for intersecting
>> landuse in belgium (only in france)
>>
>> So i already moved a lot of them arround in the south border of belgium
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Glenn Plas <glenn at byte-consult.be>wrote:
>>
>>>  On 26-11-13 14:22, Ben Abelshausen wrote:
>>>
>>>  On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Glenn Plas <glenn at byte-consult.be>wrote:
>>>
>>>> that's not even accurate for our side of the border.  omfg.   This
>>>> constitutes a huge amount of work to create this beast, and I wonder why
>>>> one would hurt himself like that..  Now, how to go about removing this
>>>> totally useless relation.
>>>>
>>>
>>>   Removing the belgian parts will require deletions on the relations,
>>> and you can bet someone has that zone under watch , so we will eventually
>>> trigger a reaction from them.
>>>
>>>
>>>  I would suggest not to remove it but just to move it's boundary to the
>>> french border. I think this is the result of a french landcover import.
>>>
>>>   It is, the changeset comment says it's coming from an import.  (but
>>> then they violated the 'dedicated account' point by doing this via a real
>>> user account )
>>>
>>>
>>>  Jo might know this, he also follows the fr-list I think.
>>>
>>>
>>> We should ask them why they use a relation in the first place.
>>>
>>> Things like this are the reason you need a human to review automated
>>> imports before the push.   common sense is hard to program ;-)
>>>
>>> Glenn
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-be mailing list
>>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20131126/a8c7c291/attachment.htm>