[OSM-talk-be] Brussels and Belgium

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:57:05PM +0100, Wouter Hamelinck wrote:
> If you really want to use it as a geographical definition for the
> communities, why would you use the one from art127 and not the ones
> from articles 128 or 129? Especially 129 doesn't mention Brussels.

Please note that 129 is about languages.  It basicly doesn't allow
the communities to say what language should be used in Brussels
because it's bilingual.

Maybe I wasn't clear enough, but I have always had a problem with
mapping the communities in the first place since they are about
the person and not the land.  But there are people that want to
map that.  And if we're going to map them than we should try to do
it as correctly as possible.


Kurt