[OSM-talk-be] fietspad of niet

[Marc Gemis]

2013/10/2 Gilbert Hersschens <ghersschens at gmail.com>:
> Ik denk dat de foto bij
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway duidelijk is. Een
> bord C3 met onderbord is niet hetzelfde als een bord D7.
>

Via deze pagina vond ik
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Belgium

Kent iemand die pagina ? Een van de uitspraken is bv. dat  designated
niet nodig in België is.

"There's no reason for a "designated" access tag in Belgium as there
is no reason why one has more rights over the other on any of these
highway types when different vehicle types have access to a road.
"designated" is therefore synonym with "yes". Footways could both be
signed with a sign that doesn't show a pedestrian at all, and one that
does, so basing a designated tag on traffic signs is also flawed."


-----

English Version

>From the page mentioned by Gilbert, I discovered
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Belgium.
It states e.g. that the key designated is useless in Belgium:

"There's no reason for a "designated" access tag in Belgium as there
is no reason why one has more rights over the other on any of these
highway types when different vehicle types have access to a road.
"designated" is therefore synonym with "yes". Footways could both be
signed with a sign that doesn't show a pedestrian at all, and one that
does, so basing a designated tag on traffic signs is also flawed."


groeten/regards

m