[OSM-talk-be] Testing playing arround to check if we did it good??? Nope...
Marc Gemis
marc.gemis at gmail.com
Thu Dec 4 20:02:15 UTC 2014
osrm has no problem: http://osrm.at/agU
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Jakka <vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com> wrote:
> After 24:00 hr still not ok.
> Do not know if the corrections al already been rendered.
> I cannot find what tag is tu much or to less?
>
> J.
>
> Marc Gemis schreef op 3/12/2014 om 15:28:
>
>> no problem, you're welcome.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Jakka
>> <vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com
>> <mailto:vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Graphview plugin installed.
>> Section N58 acces=no deleted.
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>>
>>
>> Marc Gemis schreef op 3/12/2014 om 12:20:
>>
>> There is a very small section of the N58, just before the new
>> right turn
>> you made, that still has access= no
>> See [1], which is a screenshot of JOSM with the graphview
>> plugin. All
>> white lines are accessible, the other colors not.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> m
>>
>> [1]
>> http://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/__Screenshots/Screenshots-1/i-__
>> 6jCdttq
>> <http://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/Screenshots/Screenshots-1/i-6jCdttq>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Jakka
>> <vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com
>> <mailto:vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com>
>> <mailto:vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com
>> <mailto:vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com>>__>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know mappers do not map for renders but ......
>> Whats that ???
>> E17 not my work but N58 I work on it "turns"
>>
>> https://graphhopper.com/maps/?____point=50.772059%2C3.
>> 193701&____point=50.774166%2C3.187977&____layer=MapQuest
>> <https://graphhopper.com/maps/?__point=50.772059%2C3.193701&
>> __point=50.774166%2C3.187977&__layer=MapQuest>
>>
>> <https://graphhopper.com/maps/__?point=50.772059%2C3.193701&
>> __point=50.774166%2C3.187977&__layer=MapQuest
>> <https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=50.772059%2C3.193701&
>> point=50.774166%2C3.187977&layer=MapQuest>>
>>
>> Jakka
>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>> <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.__org
>> <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.____org/listinfo/talk-be
>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/talk-be
>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/talk-be
>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/talk-be
>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20141204/592107f7/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list