[OSM-talk-be] Jachtpaden are not cycleway Highway (path along the rivers)

[Jakka]

 > highway=service
 > service=towpath
 > access=private


jaagpaden tekst vermeld met nadruk "met vergunning"
acces= permissive
nederlandse item keuze "Algemene toegang=met vergunning"
of zou deze service=towpath te niet doen?

 > bicycle=yes
 > foot=yes
 > surface=asphatl/earth/
 > maxspeed=30

Marc Gemis schreef op 7/12/2014 om 8:19:
> This topic pops up from time to time, see e.g.
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2013-July/004376.html
> . Don't remember the outcome, besides that they are not cycleways and do
> not have names in general.
>
> If I would start completely afresh I would propose:
> highway=service
> service=towpath
> access=private
> bicycle=yes
> foot=yes
> surface=asphatl/earth/
> maxspeed=30
>
> In some cases the access might be more "open", such as destination or
> even "yes".
>
> m
>
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Jakka
> <vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com
> <mailto:vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     "jachtpaden" near the "Leie" "Schelde" "Albert Kanaal"enz... are
>     tagged as "cycleway" but in serveye there is no sign
>     http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/__wiki/NL:Cycleway
>     <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway>
>     http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/__Fietspad
>     <http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fietspad>
>     And the owner of those ways says:
>     http://www.descheepvaart.be/__Rubriek/Recreatie/Jaagpaden.__aspx
>     <http://www.descheepvaart.be/Rubriek/Recreatie/Jaagpaden.aspx>
>     What would be the correct tag?
>
>     Jakka