[OSM-talk-be] Géomatique Wallonne - strategic plan

[Julien Fastré]

Hi,

@Ben : I had contact with Philippe D. who works on this topic.

The idea was to synchronize the OSM and OKFN work on this topic, but
give back two advices. We are thinking that repeating things twice may
have a bigger impact... (We do not know if this is true...)

@all :

I have a question regarding the OSM opinion : do you think whe should
keep the chapter about Free Software ?

Open Source and Open Data are two differents subjects. Enemies of Open
Data may counter-argues that "for doing Open Data, you must use Open
Source and this is a problem", which is not the reality (ESRI does Open
Data).

Having in the same document arguments in favors of Open data AND Open
Source is difficult, because they are differents topics, which are
related, but not completely.

The risk is to loose the "pro-" open data which are not "pro-" open source.

Julien

Le 14/03/14 20:47, Ben Abelshausen a écrit :
> Hi Julien,
>
> I already read part of your comments but I will try and have a closer
> look soon... I also received word that OKFN is doing the same. Maybe
> we could merge this work with theirs?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ben
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20140315/c01189db/attachment.htm>