[OSM-talk-be] Complex kruispunt / Complex crossing

Wouter Hamelinck wouter.hamelinck at gmail.com
Tue May 13 06:15:54 UTC 2014


Wow, based on the Bing images a simple T-crossing and a bypass is all
there is in reality.
Also, note the nice examples of about everything that can go wrong
when drawing parallel cycleways along the N47.

wouter

2014-05-13 6:35 GMT+02:00 Jo <winfixit at gmail.com>:
> Zeker wel, het klopt niet om een aparte weg te tekenen voor elk rijvak.
>
> Absolutely, using a separate way to represent traffic lanes is not how it's
> supposed to be done.
>
> Jo
>
>
> 2014-05-13 5:48 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hallo,
>>
>> Ik vraag me af of het OK is het volgende kruispunt te vereenvoudigen via
>> turn:lanes : http://osm.org/go/0Ejo5_fqb--?way=51738440
>>
>> I wonder whether it's ok to simplify the following crossing with
>> turn:lanes tagging: http://osm.org/go/0Ejo5_fqb--?way=51738440
>>
>> met vriendelijke groeten
>> regards
>>
>> m
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>



-- 
"Den som ikke tror på seg selv kommer ingen vei."
                                       - Thor Heyerdahl




More information about the Talk-be mailing list