[OSM-talk-be] Cycleways tag as oneway=yes ?

Jakka vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com
Tue Nov 11 11:09:46 UTC 2014


This roundabout was already in the sytem with all the details separated 
footway, cycle way, highway.

hope better link. (How taken a link of josm screen ? permalink?)

https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=50.788276%2C3.133957&point=50.794787%2C3.137348&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk

Marc Gemis schreef op 11/11/2014 om 11:57:
> Weird, I always thought that you do not have to add oneway=yes to a
> roundabout, in case it is tagged as junction=roundabout.
>
> For the route you specified, I don't see any separately drawn cycleways.
> Anyway, do not forget to tag the main road with bicycle=use_sidepath in
> such case. And to properly connect the cycleway with all crossings,
> including T-crossing on the other side of the road.
>
> regards
>
> m
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Jakka
> <vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com
> <mailto:vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     Tried out route planner for bikes and saw in my region that the
>     planner takes the wrong side of the road.
>
>     https://graphhopper.com/maps/?__point=50.788276%2C3.133957&__point=Kortrijkstraat%2C%__208930%2C%20Menin%2C%__20Belgium&vehicle=bike&__elevation=true&layer=Lyrk
>     <https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=50.788276%2C3.133957&point=Kortrijkstraat%2C%208930%2C%20Menin%2C%20Belgium&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk>
>
>     The roundabout I will correct it to oneway=yes
>     but other roads with the lane on both side of the roads must they
>     been change one by one to oneway=yes
>     --
>
>     Jakka
>
>






More information about the Talk-be mailing list