[OSM-talk-be] addr:street on way

[Glenn Plas]

On 16-09-14 15:24, André Pirard wrote:
> On 2014-09-16 10:43, Glenn Plas wrote :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed some update of our einzelganger TAA putting up addres
>> information on the way.  Please correct me if I'm wrong but I think this
>> is not correct, check way:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24301581#map=19/50.96972/4.47523
>>
>> Now he put a 'name' key + an addr:street key in it.    I'm about to
>> delete this mistake but I wanted to make sure that no radical changes
>> have been implemented lately making this ok.
>>
>> Let me know what you think.
> I checked it as requested and I see nothing wrong in this

Thanks, that must be since my fix I've already committed, check the
previous version of this way instead.


> 
> bicycle <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle?uselang=en> 	yes
> highway <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway?uselang=en>
> residential
> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=residential?uselang=en>
> maxspeed <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed?uselang=en> 	50
> name <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name?uselang=en> 	Damstraat
> 
> 
> except that bicycle=yes is meaningless if there's no other tag
> forbidding bikes such as access=no.
> It's a very very very common mistake all over the country making newbies
> believe that it's forbidding cars.
> It should be removed.

Will do.  There is no cycleway at all, it's a small street, barely wide
enough for 2 cars to pass.  That tag is probably not from his last edit
but from years ago.

You can still see his changeset and what changed here:

http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=25463368

Greetings

Glenn

> The mapper may have meant cycleway
> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway>=track or some other
> variant of that.

The arm-chair bing mapper would probably not even know what's out there
in real live though.

Glenn