[OSM-talk-be] When using Contact (Schema with 'contact:*'prefix) and contact (common schema)

[Jo]

Unfortunately making the query work is only one part of the problem. To
display 2 labels with umap, you have to use 2 lines, of which 1 will remain
empty. I guess there's still a bit of work to do on the umap side as well.

Jo



2015-04-11 20:50 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:

> I would just stay with email. I vaguely remember reading the same advice
> on the tagging mailing list earlier this year. According to taginfo just
> email is just twice as much as contact:email.
>
> And yes, two competing tagging schemes means that every data consumer has
> to make two queries (or use "OR" in one way or another).
>
> regards
>
> m
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Jakka <vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>> When using Contact (Schema with 'contact:*'prefix) and contact (common
>> schema)
>> Contact (Schema with 'contact:*'prefix) needed when multi contact are
>> possible ?
>> using contact (common schema) single contact?
>>
>> Does this give a problem when using a program like umap you need always
>> use double "filter/Overpass-turbo.eu" (phone-fax-website-email) like
>>
>> tag email=xxx at yyyyy.com and
>> tag contact:email=xxx at yyyyy.com
>>
>> or am i wrong?
>>
>> Jakka
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20150411/996d5228/attachment.htm>