[OSM-talk-be] Map without attribution

[Sander Deryckere]

2015-02-02 12:55 GMT+01:00 Jo <winfixit at gmail.com>:

>
> Asking to free the toilets dataset wouldn't hurt either (they don't even
>> have to do anything technically, we can just copy it from the OSM-based
>> printed map and the listed addresses).
>>
>
> Is that after they'd give their consent to do so? Or is the fact they used
> OSM as the background enough to have freed that dataset? That would be very
> surprising.
>
> That's after their agreement. Displaying different datasets on top of each
other (without mixing them) doesn't trigger the share-alike clause.


> Anyway, I agree that it would be far better if we could include those
> bathrooms in our data. At that point they could render a map based solely
> on OSM with an empasis on what they deem important to show on such a map. I
> think it's important to tell it to them that way. Maybe point them to umap
> or maperitive as well.
>
> Jo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20150202/5e91abc2/attachment.htm>