[OSM-talk-be] It was only a matter of time ...

[Glenn Plas]

I know, just figured this out myself, I didn't know, I'll correct it.

 14-01-15 17:54, Marc Gemis wrote:
> one small mistake from your side :-)
> building=residential is allowed,
> see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dresidential
> But if it was building=house (or another more specialised description)
> before, it would be wrong to retag it of course.
> 
> regards
> 
> m
> 
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Glenn Plas <glenn at byte-consult.be
> <mailto:glenn at byte-consult.be>> wrote:
> 
>     I really start hating the ID editor + bing as a background.  I completed
>     all streetnames/buildings on postal codes 1980/1981/1982
> 
>     This changeset pretty much destroyed most of my work,  simple buildings
>     are turned into multipolygons,  building=residential.
> 
>     Realigning the buildings is piece of cake luckily. The worst part is
>     that he actually thinks he's corrected stuff.
> 
>     https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28140575
> 
>     The common denominator is always ID + Bing.
> 
>     Glenn
> 
>     --
>     "Everything is going to be 200 OK."
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Talk-be mailing list
>     Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
> 


-- 
"Everything is going to be 200 OK."