[OSM-talk-be] is this ok?

[Jo]

I'll contact him. Thanks for noticing it. umap is a good alternative for
this.

Polyglot

2015-07-02 8:15 GMT+02:00 joost schouppe <joost.schouppe at gmail.com>:

> So will someone who speaks better French than I do please talk to them? It
> would  be nice if we can turn his project into something OSM-proof;
> otherwise we can still orient him towards umap etc...
>
> 2015-07-02 0:41 GMT+02:00 Jo <winfixit at gmail.com>:
>
>> They aren't categories. At some point there was  a type=collection
>> relation, but since the advent of Overpass API it's not needed anymore
>>
>> Jo
>>
>> 2015-07-02 0:38 GMT+02:00 Ruben Maes <ruben at janmaes.com>:
>>
>>> Definitely not OK, relations aren't collections. (I know it's in the
>>> wiki somewhere but not where exactly)
>>>
>>>
>>> Op woensdag 1 juli 2015 heeft joost schouppe <joost.schouppe at gmail.com>
>>> het volgende geschreven:
>>> > This new user added a lot of viewpoints and made a relation of them:
>>> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5331824
>>> >
>>> > I think the idea is to collect some nice spots to rest in the shade.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-be mailing list
>>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20150702/c715fbe9/attachment.htm>