[OSM-talk-be] Fietsknooppunten, bicycle nodes "Roundabouts and around squares"

[marc at vmarc.be]

Marc,

>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have a question about : http://osma.vmarc.be/en/route/1758816 [2] 
>>> The problem
>>> here is a "virtual path" in a pedestrian area tagged as 
>>> route='bicycle", but
>>> used in a walking/hiking/foot route.
>>> Anything I can do to solve the problem without "tagging for the 
>>> QA-tool" ?
>> 
>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Put foot=yes on the virtual path?
> 
> On 2015-05-19 13:38, Marc Gemis wrote:
> 
> that's what I did, but I wonder whether Marc takes that into account 
> for his QA tool

Yes, foot=yes should make the warning go away. The logic of the analyzer 
is as
described at http://osma.vmarc.be/en/glossary#accessible, and quoted 
here:

> Currently the validation rule dictates that one of the following is 
> true for each
> way in the route relation for the route to be considered "accessible":
> 
>  - The way has a value for tag "highway".
>  - The way has tag "route" with value "ferry".
>  - The way in the bicycle network has tag "bicycle" with value "yes".
>  - The way in the hiking network has tag "foot" with value "yes".

The text above is followed by:

> These rules should probably be further refined.

Let me know if you have any ideas to improve these rules.

Regards,
Marc