[OSM-talk-be] mapping farm-shop

[Pieter Brusselman]

I do nut fully agree: If a shop=cheese stops his activity and another is 
comming into place eg. shop=bicycle, you also have to re-tag it.

In general a farm-shop sells the same category all year round, like meat 
and vegetables.  Or cheese and bread.  Or...
And as a customer you know that - depending on the season - the range of 
product changes.

And at this moment it is only possible if you do it this way: 
shop=farm;diary;meat.  But this is discouraged ;-)

So I was looking for the correct way.  But it seems that there is not 
yet one sollution.  I will follow Joost's suggestion and work on a proposal.

Grtz,
Pieter


Op 21/04/2016 om 15:12 schreef Glenn Plas:
> I just had to update my example from 3 years ago because both source and
> website key have changed.
>
> website: went to pretty url's instead of id's
> source: producer ID changed for unknown reason
>
> It's already hard to keep those up to date.  If you start putting in
> volatile and variable data like products they sell, you have to keep
> them updated as well, which is a lot of work.
>
> I do not see a real benefit in saving that information in OSM at this
> point.  The fact that you 'want' to do it does not count.
>
> the interwebs is made of URL's  , defined as 'Uniform Resource Locator'.
>
> That is exactly what a product list is... it's a resource locator.  We
> do it with wiki links and nobody bats an eye over it.  We should really
> use links to the data instead of copies.
>
> Can I can a 'amen' now ? ;-)
>
> Glenn
>
>
> On 21-04-16 14:26, joost schouppe wrote:
>> Marc, while I do agree that we don't need to do everything, I haven't
>> seen many convincing reasons why not to do a certain thing. Often the
>> arguments used (too complex, who is going to update, imagine what if
>> everyone does this,...) can be used anything we do.
>> And then after a while the people wanting to do the thing have actually
>> done it, and we all got used to it.
>>
>> Pieter, I was trying to remember who showed me that site - so it must
>> have been one of you guys. I would suggest looking at the proposal I
>> linked, looking at the reactions on the tagging list. Then make a new
>> proposal, learning from the feedback. It might be useful to really
>> explain the use of such a project. And also try to show that the idea is
>> not really new: we do very similar things for organic products
>> ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:organic ), gas stations,
>> vending machines, glass containers, etc etc.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20160421/f94b2704/attachment.htm>