[OSM-talk-be] Agiv import

[Marc Gemis]

It's up to the mapper that does the import to check each building individually.
It's not different than noticing that a building is partly destroyed
on the AGIV imagery and adapting the GRB building according to that.

m

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Ruben Maes <ruben at janmaes.com> wrote:
> Sunday 24 January 2016 19:03:35, Glenn Plas:
>> (...)
>> In the whole of Stekene, I probably deleted no more than 20 buildings
>> on multiple thousands that got imported with good reasons.  Deleting
>> is not an issue.
>> (...)
>> Tag migration and merging takes more time than replaceing the geometry
>> itself.  Every time the merge conflict dialog pops up, you'll loose 15
>> seconds, multiply that by thousands of buildings...
>> (...)
>
> I also mean when the geometry in OSM is actually better than in the GRB. I'm thinking in particular about VIVES in Bruges. The GRB building shape is just wrong. In OSM it's better (may be not perfect, it's a complex building) and 3D mapped.
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.18741/3.20325
>
> --
> This message is OpenPGP signed.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>