[OSM-talk-be] Agiv import

[Marc Gemis]

What's the planning for the import ?

* Glenn finishes documentation (although I think it's (almost) ready)
* We pass this somehow through the import mailing list ( I fear we
cannot avoid this). Sander, you have some experience with this. What
do you think ?
* We have a face-to-face meeting / hangout to explain the procedure to
interested people.  Face-to-face is better I think, but might not be
feasible for everyone. Perhaps a combination ?
* We start "the import". Somehow we need an overview for this to see
who is working on a certain town. (a shared document/spreadsheet)



m.


On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Glenn Plas <glenn at byte-consult.be> wrote:
>
>> I also mean when the geometry in OSM is actually better than in
>> the GRB. I'm thinking in particular about VIVES in Bruges. The GRB
>>  building shape is just wrong. In OSM it's better (may be not
>> perfect, it's a complex building) and 3D mapped.
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.18741/3.20325
>
> Yes of course. that's why I call it a merge. since this process
> encompasses using AGIV sat layer, and GRB layer in JOSM itself, it's
> not hard to see where GRB has got it wrong.
>
> No need to worry about losing good OSM data, when done right..
>
> Glenn
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be