[OSM-talk-be] GR Flanders data available for mapping!

[joost schouppe]

GR wil een artikel schrijven voor hun tijdschrift "Op Weg". Deadline is 20
juni. Tegen dan komt er ook al een (beknopter) bericht op hun website over
de samenwerking. Het nummer zal in de bus vallen begin augustus bij 5000
leden en is ook te vinden in de betere tijdschriftenhandel.
Het artikel zou 2 pagina's beslaan, inclusief enkele afbeeldingen.

Enkele vragen waar Luc nog mee zit, staan in deze hackpad. Je kan er ook
links naar foto's of video's droppen.

https://hackpad.com/OSM-in-GR-boekje-tFaXcmskD4j




2016-06-07 7:33 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:

> With a server you could also keep count of the number of relations over
> time and monitor changes. That is what Wambacher does for admin boundaries.
> So you will also see when people delete route relations, something that is
> harder to do with Josm and Overpass. You might also monitor large changes
> in the route themselves, e.g. people rerouting them without breaking them.
>
> I have seen several people offering hardware for the Belgian community,
> but nobody seems to do something with those offers.
>
> m
> Op 6 jun. 2016 23:43 schreef "Jo" <winfixit at gmail.com>:
>
> We're doing that in JOSM. It isn't very hard to download all relations of
>> a given type for a region using Overpass and then run JOSM's validator on
>> it.
>>
>> I then fix the problem. The validator usually reports some other
>> problems, which I also resolve, then upload. The run the validator on the
>> whole dataset once more, and so on.
>>
>> That's how I'm fixing problems with the route relations and improving the
>> detail in some spots. It should become easier as we progress with the
>> development.
>>
>> For an online tool, I don't have the resources, although it might happen
>> I create something for integrating PT (and keeping it up to date) using
>> PythonAnywhere.com.
>>
>> Jo
>>
>> 2016-06-06 23:02 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Darya is working on such a tool for public transport (GSoC project). I
>>> don't
>>> > think it would be very hard to extend it to walking and cycle routes.
>>> But
>>> > let's see in a month or 2 if there is time left to do that.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Will  that be a website ?  A bit like vmarc's website for walking
>>> networks or Wambacher's boundary website? It would be nice to get an
>>> overview of broken relations, without having to download an area and
>>> then run a "validator".
>>>
>>> For me, WhoDidIt is not ideal. I rather see something listing all
>>> "broken" relations in an area (read Belgium)
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> m
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>


-- 
Joost @
Openstreetmap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
<http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20160608/b2478844/attachment.htm>