[OSM-talk-be] Beginning with survey new "Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen"

[mgwebmail at fastmail.fm]

There is also http://osma.vmarc.be <http://osma.vmarc.be/> which does a great work regarding quality analysis of a node network.

> On 11 Mar 2016, at 17:10, Jakka <vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Jo schreef op 11/03/2016 om 13:52:
>> It's been a long while since I worked on those cycle and walking
>> networks. I'm rather busy with a GSoC project for a better plugin to
>> help with mapping of Public Transport and all these Missing Maps
>> Mapathons and mapping/validating for HOT lately.
>> 
>> Are you using the script I created a few years ago?
> 
> 
> Do you mean this
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Polyglot/Some_ways_to_simplify_editing_cycle_node_routes_with_JOSM <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Polyglot/Some_ways_to_simplify_editing_cycle_node_routes_with_JOSM>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 2016-03-11 11:55 GMT+01:00 Ben Laenen
>> <benlaenen at gmail.com <mailto:benlaenen at gmail.com>
>> <mailto:benlaenen at gmail.com <mailto:benlaenen at gmail.com>>>:
>> 
>>    On Friday 11 March 2016 10:59:56 Jakka wrote:
>>     > [...]
>>    > The new node 85 over the bridge to north is also divided to avoid
>>    > crossing roads.
>>    >
>>    > These examples are with two mean node of same number. I thing there will
>>    > be others with more node of the same mean node...
>>    >
>>    > Thinking the new network has a lot of security measures with multi fork
>>    > nodes with same number.And those will not close together.
>>    >
>>    > How do we deal with this.
>> 
>>    This has been long solved: tag those multiple nodes with their
>>    normal number
>>    (e.g. "07"), and from each node, create relations to the nodes they
>>    connect to
>>    using forward/backward roles on the ways.
>> 
>>    There's an example at
>>    http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_Node_Network_Tagging#Split_nodes_and_the_tentacles_extending_the_routes_to_connect_them
>> 
>>    Greetings,
>>    Ben
>> 
>> 
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    Talk-be mailing list
>>    Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>>    <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>>
>>    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20160314/dfdeaad7/attachment.htm>