[OSM-talk-be] trees (in a row) vs. tree_row

[joost schouppe]

In the case you showed on Mapillary, I think I would leave a gap in between
two rows.

In general, I think the reason for using tree_row is just a matter of
mapping speed and what you can see: on an aerial picture, you can easily
make out a tree row, but it is harder to pin-point the exact location of
the trees. There's also the argument that we tend to only map individual
trees if they are "significant". Of course what makes a tree significant is
up to mapper discretion.

If you're looking for a wider range of opinions, do ask the same question
in the tagging mailing list. I've come to kind of enjoy the merry-go-round
discussions there, so I'm willing to ask for you and report here :)

2017-02-02 12:08 GMT+01:00 Karel Adams <fa348739 at skynet.be>:

> Not hindered by any expertise or authority, I feel tempted to reply: if,
> in full foliage, they cast one continuous shadow, then it is a row; if not,
> they are separate trees.
>
> KA
>
> On 02/02/17 10:42, Pieter Brusselman wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> When do you decide that trees are closed enough into a line to map them as
> a tree_row or just map them as individual trees?
>
> for example: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.07764176804454&lng=3.
> 5352408793126244&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=EmDXwpiZawxLmLwO574imw
>
>
> Grtz,
> Pieter
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing listTalk-be at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>


-- 
Joost Schouppe
OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
<http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20170203/913d0988/attachment.htm>