[OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle

[André Pirard]

On 2017-03-25 17:49, Marc Gemis wrote:
> the problem with a subtag is that you cannot use it in combination
> with oneway. Now you can map it as oneway:moped_A/B/P = yes
Yes we can, as: :moped:A=yes
When using namespace <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Namespace>,
":A" means a qualifier of what is before it, "moped", meaning which part
of the mopeds we are talking about "a moped of class A". And "moped:A"
applies to "oneway", which part of the vehicles one-way is for.
Unfortunately, as often with OSM docs, that article isn't very clear
that namespace can be multilevel and in what order.
The worst of it is that some contributors don't like namespace and scold
those who speak about it, saying "we don't do like that" (who is "we"?).

Cheers

André.






>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Santens Seppe <Seppe.Santens at stad.gent> wrote:
>> Am I correct moped_A and moped_B are only used in Belgium? Can we have a moped_P? Or would it be better to review the moped tag and make it something like moped=yes + moped:A=yes + moped:P=yes?
>> (by the way, a lot of new class A + P exception signs will be introduced in the city of Ghent on 03/04/2017)
>>
>> Seppe
>>
>>
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.gemis at gmail.com]
>> Verzonden: vrijdag 17 maart 2017 14:36
>> Aan: Jakka; OpenStreetMap Belgium
>> Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle
>>
>> How do we map the "P" category ? We already have moped_A and moped_B.
>>
>> m
>>
>> 2017-03-17 12:53 GMT+01:00 Jakka <vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com>:
>>> Nouveaux panneaux de signalisation pour les deux-roues
>>> http://www.code-de-la-route.be/textes-legaux/sections/ar/code-de-la-route/248-art65
>>>
>>> Nieuwe verkeers- onderborden voor tweewielers onder de aandacht brengen.
>>> http://wegcode.be/wetteksten/secties/kb/wegcode/248-art65
>>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20170326/ba3ad39d/attachment.htm>