[OSM-talk-be] Digital Globe Images
Julien Minet
juminet at gmail.com
Fri May 12 18:12:02 UTC 2017
Yop,
In Belgique du Sud, I think DG standard imagery is from May-June 2015.
Lastest SPW imagery is April 2015 (I have very good, changing ground truth
for 2015!).
If remenber well our last OSM meeting in LLN, we haerd that SPW will
release 2016 or 2017 imagery soon.
Julien
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Lionel Giard <lionel.giard at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes it seems to be a little bit more recent than 2015 SPW imagery in
> Chaumont area (like a few month between the two). But the main disadvantage
> is that the pixel size seems to be higher in Digital Globe imagery (the
> image looks coarser). Bing still is the clearest imagery of all (with the
> high constrast that help recognize the items). Would like to get a recent
> imagery of Wallonia with good contrast like Urbis or AGIV ahah.
>
> 2017-05-12 12:40 GMT+02:00 Thibaut Philippart <
> thibaut.philippart at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> The imagery seems to be also more recent than SPW (less than 1 year in
>> LLN and Chaumont area ; I didn't check in other areas).
>>
>> Yep, definitely useful !
>>
>> Thibaut
>>
>> On May 12, 2017 8:51 AM, joost schouppe <joost.schouppe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, they even seemed to prioritize areas which had no decent coverage at
>> all. For example, I checked my "area of interest" in Bolivia, and there's a
>> lot of new woods to map (I like to following the outline of civilization):
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/-17.3651/-65.2039
>>
>> Tais just pointed out that in Congo as well, some places are now mapable
>> that weren't before. So if you had some areas of interest that had bad
>> imagery before, now you will probably have something better.
>>
>> As for Belgium: the imagery seems to be much more recent than Bing, check
>> for example here:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=18/50.63689/4.17203
>>
>> I for one am not going to use SPW imagery until we have a more official
>> letter from them, so for my Walloon mapping, this is definitely useful.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Joost Schouppe
>> OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
>> Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
>> <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20170512/9bf05e51/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list