[OSM-talk-be] 90->70 in Vlaanderen

[joost schouppe]

Hi Glenn,

I'm not sure we should fix this ourselves. I think we can ask Be-mobile to
fix this. But maybe a revert is in order.
Be-mobile didn't discuss this in advance, but just let us know they did
afterwards. I personally failed in following this up, so now we have this
mess on the mailing list. First steps are always hard, and when you try to
do too much in your first step, you can have a big mess up. Let's not judge
them too much, and try to make this a learning experience, not a first and
last step. But there is definitely a lot of learning to be had!

I can't judge the quality of their WMS, as I can only get it to tell me
"something is wrong here", not what needs to happen. The base data from AWV
seems to be correct, at least in the case Marc found. So I would guess it's
a question of instructions gone wrong.

In many cases there is both AWV data (which the people at AWV were quite
confident about) and Mapillary traffic signs, so we do have some material
to work with. It would be nice to have an idea of the size of the problem,
so we can give more info to Be-Mobile. Of course we need a quick solution,
but I think it would be best if a larger problem caused by a paid mapper
doesn't need to be fixed by a volunteer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20170515/a3f029e8/attachment.htm>