[OSM-talk-be] Dixit JOSM: missing tag - street with odd number of lanes, but without lanes:forward and lanes:backward or oneway

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Fri May 26 03:25:30 UTC 2017


send too early:

I should have clarified that the mismatch between lanes and the
xxx:lanes tag can be explained by the different  definition of both
tags, but perhaps that is not the problem in this particular case.

> One of the problems is that the lanes-tag only count the lanes for
> cars, while all the other xxx:lanes tags should also count e.g. cycle
> lanes. None of the validators (Osmose, JOSM) that I know take this
> difference into account.
>
> m.
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Yves bxl-forever
> <bxl-forever at linuxmail.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The way I understand this warning is that a two-way highway with an odd number of lanes (in this case 3) should get "lanes:forward=2" and "lanes:backward=1" to make the count.
>> This is not linked with the "turn:lanes" key, despite the number of lanes should obviously match.
>>
>> Have a great day.
>> Yves
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 25 May 2017 03:08:56 +0200
>> "André Pirard" <a.pirard.papou at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just like Osmose does, JOSM accused me of those errors with tags I never
>>> wrote: here <http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1006680> and here
>>> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1006679>.
>>> It appears that the mapper used turn:lanes:… and that JOSM wants lanes:…
>>> I'll leave it to the specialists whether the mapper must correct a
>>> mistake or open a JOSM bug.
>>>
>>> TIA,
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> André.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be




More information about the Talk-be mailing list