[OSM-talk-be] How to request arbitration?
Karel Adams
fa348739 at skynet.be
Mon Apr 2 10:01:36 UTC 2018
Thanks Jo, that brought a smile!
The crux of the matter is of course that I can NOT fly into it, it being
so private as to be almost secretive. In fact I am wondering more and
more why these guys so vehemently refuse to give this airstrip a name,
it really feels like something is being hushed up. Or then perhaps they
wish to abide by the rules very strictly, kind of "Befehl ist Befehl" :)
Not the kind of atmosphere I'll choose for a destination. And no, I'll
not bother to further improve our database in that area.
That I figured in WeeklyOSM is nice but perhaps my next appearance could
be more positive ;)
Smiling regards,
KA
On 02/04/18 08:51, Jo wrote:
> Karel, you are going to have to fly over to that airstrip and put up a
> large sign next to it . Photograph it and hope it catches on among the
> local population... (That's how I read Frederik Ramms comment)
>
> I didn't look at the changeset. We have a description tag, if it's a
> description and not a name. Of course if it's only in English, maybe
> description:en?
>
> Anyway, you made it into WeeklyOSM.
>
> Jo
>
> 2018-04-02 7:57 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com
> <mailto:marc.gemis at gmail.com>>:
>
> Did you contact the owner of the airfield to find out how they name it
> ? Did you find a sign along the street pointing to the airfield with a
> name ? Is there a name sign at the entrance ? Is there an official
> document from a government which mentions a name ?
>
> If all of those questions return false, i.e. no name, then the
> airfield has no name. Maybe there are a few other places where we can
> look for the item of items, but making them up from ones armchair is
> certainly not one of them.
>
> No everybody gives their house, private tennis court, driveway or
> airfield a name. So noname=yes might be the only thing we can do. We
> should not make up names as "Airfield of Family Anderson", "Airfield
> near road N111" or whatever.
>
> Regards
>
> m.
>
>
> p.s. @Pieter, SomeoneElse, who participates in the changeset
> discussion is member of the DWG.
>
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Karel Adams <fa348739 at skynet.be
> <mailto:fa348739 at skynet.be>> wrote:
> > I am in a bitter dispute with a couple of mappers who absolutely
> refuse to
> > accept a "name=*" tag on an aerodrome because officially it has
> no name -
> > indeed it figures in no official document.
> >
> > My point of view is that an "invented" name - which can be
> discussed, of
> > course - is better than no name at all but they are quite
> adamant. How to
> > address this?
> >
> > For the details: see
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57717417
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57717417> and
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573934869
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573934869>
> >
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names> has been called in but
> I found
> > nothing there to indicate only official names should be mentioned.
> >
> > This seems really a case for arbitration, but how to request it?
> >
> > Karel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-be mailing list
> > Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20180402/571707cc/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list