[OSM-talk-be] Update Slow Roads conventions Belgium
Marc Gemis
marc.gemis at gmail.com
Sat Dec 15 14:20:50 UTC 2018
I don't want to reconstuct the map from 1800, I want to map what I see
on the sign.
If I see a sign like
https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2018/2018-10-07-Opdorp-Lippelobos/i-sFgCzRj,
I want to somehow map "Lippelooweg / Buurtweg 57" and "Buurtweg 58",
regardless of what a map from 1800 says.
m.
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 3:17 PM Ben Laenen <benlaenen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2018, 14:59 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I suggested that, as I think it is an part of the ref. We do map "E19"
>> as well, not just 19.
>> I want to be able te reconstruct the sign as I see it during a survey.
>
>
>
> Yeah but those words aren't very consistent in usage, do you take the French words for Flemish roads because the Atlas was made in French for that municipality? In the end there are only two types, a path and a road, and there's no difference in a path being a sentier, pad, voetpad or voetweg on one map from the 1800s.
>
> Also, if you want what's on the map, you'd need to have "Sentier n° 117" as well for example.
>
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list