[OSM-talk-be] temporary cycle routes

[Ben Abelshausen]

In London some of the routes are mapped as proposed, it's a bit annoying if
you don't know that they are just proposed and not actually there:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6691788

Rendering is a dotted version of the normal line on the cycle layer:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.54524/-0.01871&layers=C

So, not sure if we should be mapping this if they don't exist yet... but if
it's an 'official' detour why not? Some of these routes are only virtual
anyway and not signed at all.

Cheers,
Ben

On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:55 PM, joost schouppe <joost.schouppe at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I got an interesting question today. As the Flemish "fietsostrades"
> (fietssnelwegen, or cycle highways) are taking shape, so they are being
> mapped in OSM. People are already using the data, even though in reality,
> this is till very much a project.
>
> In more and more places, parts are completely ready, but then just stop.
> And in some cases, there is an "official detour" of the fietsostrade. So
> while the infrastructure is not there yet, in a sense the route is already
> there.
>
> How do you think this should be mapped, if at all?
>
> --
> Joost Schouppe
> OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
> Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
> <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20180201/5c81d94d/attachment.htm>