[OSM-talk-be] Mapping of motorways - use of int_ref tag on nodes?

[Yves bxl-forever]

OK, thanks.  I’ve talked to the mapper and it was a mistake, indeed, not a "new tagging scheme".
Problem solved.



On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:24:46 +0200
Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:

> int_ref only on way.
> I think most motorways in Belgium where mapped correctly, before this change.
> 
> Perhaps a mistake of the user which selected ways and nodes before
> adding/changing the int_ref ?
> Feel free to reach out to the mapper that made the mistake.
> 
> regards
> 
> m.
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 1:26 AM Yves bxl-forever
> <bxl-forever at linuxmail.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I came across something fishy:
> >
> > node
> >   [int_ref="E 411"]
> >   (50.792806,4.417019,50.823614,4.481392);
> > out;
> >
> >
> > It seems that someone is routinely applying the "int_ref" tag on all individual nodes of motorways.  This seems weird and it duplicates a lot of information, because this is normally already there on the way.
> >
> > If that is not okay, I’ll try to get in touch with the mapper who did that.
> > Is anyone familiar with how to map motorways properly?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Yves
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-be mailing list
> > Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be