[OSM-talk-be] Road side parking ( Was Re: Overdreven gedetailleerde mapping ?)

[Lionel Giard]

Yes technically this is how to map it (at least how it is documented), and
using the mandatory tag "parking:condition" in combination give indication
for people looking at roadside parking (one viewer show these :
https://zlant.github.io/parking-lanes/#15/50.9452/3.1233  with Roeselare as
a somewhat good example as it is well mapped). It is primarily for showing
parking conditon (is it allowed to park ? How much time ?...). But indeed,
the tagging scheme can be improved ! ^_^

Maybe use a combination of the two : parking_space to show the individual
space (and so the capacity) and parking:lane=* + parking:condtion=* to show
the roadside parking and condition of parking. :-)

Kind Regards,

Le mar. 5 nov. 2019 à 10:06, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> a écrit :

> So for those 4 roadside parking spaces: https://osm.org/go/0EpBwBaxP?m=
> I have to split the road a couple of times, add some 3 or 4 parking
> lane tags to indicate it is somehow on both sides, parallel parking in
> marked spots? And I wouldn't be able to add the capacity in the end.
>
> While adding 4 rectangles with tag amenity=parking_space express the same?
>
> For me, there is definitely improvement possible in the tagging schema
> for such situations.
>
> m.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 9:26 AM Lionel Giard <lionel.giard at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > @Marc These parking along street are indeed often not "amenity=parking"
> but probably more related to parking:lane tag (tagged on the highway
> itself). Technically it is suggested to only map these kind of roadside
> parking with the parking:lane tag on the street.
> > But yes, it could be mapped with amenity=parking_space (without
> amenity=parking around it). and we could maybe use the
> "type=site"+"site=parking" relation to group them (as it is suggested for
> complex parking lot already) and allow people to understand that it is
> linked to the road (including the street line in the relation) and that it
> is roadside parking. But it is undocumented to use it that way. ^^
> >
> > Le mar. 5 nov. 2019 à 08:42, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>
> >> Ik map soms ook parkeerplaatsen in een straat met enkel
> >> amenity=parking_space, omdat er geen parking (in de betekenis van
> >> parkeerterrein) is.
> >> Ik vind niet dat elke groep van een paar parkeerplaatsen in een straat
> >> parkings zijn. En het wordt gerenderd, dus kan je je afvragen of de
> >> wiki niet moet aangepast worden voor zulke gevallen ?
> >>
> >> m.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20191105/a3b712aa/attachment.htm>