[OSM-talk-be] tags for prohibitory road signs in Belgium

[Stijn Rombauts]

    Op zaterdag 12 oktober 2019 21:01:06 CEST schreef s8evq <s8evqq at runbox.com>:  
 
 >On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:24:35 +0000 (UTC), Stijn Rombauts via Talk-be <talk-be at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>Thanks Stijn for taking the time to comment.
>
>> - An interesting change is the one from access=no/destination to vehicle=no/destination for the
>> C5-sign, which I support, because it's more correct. But a disadvantage is that e.g. access=no/destination
>> shows on the map, but vehicle=no/destination not. Would the proposal to treat access=no/destination and
>> vehicle=no/destination equally on the map make any chance?
>
>On what map does it not display? I'm personally not in favor of using both tags. That makes it very confusing.

A road with access=destination has grey dots: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29350445A road with vehicle=destination has no grey dots: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26496960A road with access=no has grey stripes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71578088
A road with vehicle=no has no grey stripes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28967486But perhaps I'd rather like to see all roads with limited access (access/vehicle=destination or vehicle=no) the same way and roads with no (public) access the same (access=no/private).I'm also not in favor of using both tags.

StijnRR  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20191015/c6b19d80/attachment.htm>