[OSM-talk-be] Renderen van addr:flats

[Lionel Giard]

The tagging is correct, it is just not supposed to be on area from the wiki
perspective. But indeed I don't see why it is incorrect when a building is
only containing this series of flats and only one entrance ? And if that's
incorrect why are they rendering addr:flats on area and not node ?! ^^'

Le lun. 15 juin 2020 à 13:32, joost schouppe <joost.schouppe at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Most of this data comes from the GRB import, I would guess. So it comes
> from CRAB. We use the addr:flats to map the "subaddresses".
> It seems a little weird to not be able to add the subaddresses on the same
> object that has the main address.
> The CRAB import tool mentioned this as an optional tag, that is not so
> useful for OSM:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AGIV_CRAB_Import#Optional_tags.2C_provided_by_the_tool
> I would concur that the quality of the data is not good enough to import
> it.
> Both examples come from endless_autumn, who did a rather quick-and-dirty
> GRB import - a lot of which was reverted.
> The GRB-import-validator Midgard made actually flags the flats tag as
> "consider removing" as well.
> That said, the wiki doesn't say much about the logic of "subaddresses",
> maybe we shouldn't use the addr:flats tag -at all- for subaddresses?
>
>
> Op ma 15 jun. 2020 om 09:22 schreef Sander Deryckere <sanderd17 at gmail.com
> >:
>
>> Hmm,
>>
>> it seems indeed that, according to the wiki, this should not be placed on
>> areas.
>> However, I expect that in all these cases, all flats are accessible
>> behind the same door.
>> So correcting the tag will have the same effect.
>>
>> Op ma 15 jun. 2020 om 09:12 schreef Marc M. <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Le 15.06.20 à 08:23, Sander Deryckere a écrit :
>>> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.87528/4.69102
>>>
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499694374
>>> this look like a mistake :
>>> wiki :  marking range of numbers of flats behind a door,
>>> but the object isn't a door, it's a building
>>>
>>> maybe osm.carto should avoid to render tagging mistake and target
>>> only node and maybe only with entrance or door tag
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Marc
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-be mailing list
>>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>
>
> --
> Joost Schouppe
> OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
> Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
> <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20200615/9e2704f4/attachment.htm>