[OSM-talk-be] Request to change the cycle highway network tag

Jo winfixit at gmail.com
Wed Oct 7 11:09:16 UTC 2020


Hi Wannes and Frank,

I think that is about the numbered node network. That's a different network
from the cycle_highway network. We tag that one at the rcn level. Of course
it's odd if the node numbers differ between 2 renderings.

Jo

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:43 PM Frank Vdm <vdmfrankvdm at gmail.com> wrote:

> I see difference in node numbers, view arrond st Vith.
> https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14!50.2864!6.1335
> https://www.ostbelgien.eu/nl/fiets/fietsrouteplaner
>
> Op wo 7 okt. 2020 om 11:29 schreef Wannes Soenen <wannesss at gmail.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> Op 7 okt. 2020, om 10:40 heeft Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> het volgende
>> geschreven:
>>
>> In Wallonia they don't have cycle highways yet, but they have had RaVeL
>> for longer than we do in Flanders. OK, it's not a network yet, but that can
>> change.
>>
>>
>> https://www.ostbelgien.eu/nl/fiets/fietsrouteplaner
>>
>> Eastbelgium (German speaking part of Wallonia) has a cycle network with
>> numbers and signposts. It contains the Vennbahn (which is part of the RaVel)
>> (Also a walking network at
>> https://www.ostbelgien.eu/nl/wandelen/wandelrouteplaner )
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20201007/2d643e31/attachment.htm>


More information about the Talk-be mailing list