[OSM-talk-be] Missing windmills data ?
Matthieu Gaillet
matthieu at gaillet.be
Tue Jun 22 07:21:48 UTC 2021
Can’t wait to see that.
If you find a way to change multiple objects properties at a time it would be great (i.e setting power output for the whole field at once). But that might be something to do in JOSM.
I also found a usability bug when selecting text with the mouse in a text field : if you happen to select a bit too far with the mouse cursor outside the text field, the modal window doesn’t react anymore. At least with Safari (MacOS).
> Le 21 juin 2021 à 23:22, Pieter Vander Vennet <pietervdvn at posteo.net> a écrit :
>
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> Glad you like MapComplete! It is pretty easy to set up such a map viewer/editor - you can do it yourself to for a totally different topic. A single .Json-file configures everything (and can be 'sideloaded' via the URL). An overview of all the themes is at mapcomplete.osm.be (and some more unofficial themes are on the wiki)
>
> About the Windmill-theme: next steps are to furhter polish the theme a bit further (e.g. a few more questionse, ...). You can see the source .json here: https://github.com/seppesantens/MapComplete-Themes/blob/main/OpenWindPowerMap/OpenWindPowerMap.json <https://github.com/seppesantens/MapComplete-Themes/blob/main/OpenWindPowerMap/OpenWindPowerMap.json>
>
> I'm still cooking up a feature to do unit handling better - when that is done, I'm expecting a PR from Seppe to have it as official theme into mapcomplete and to promote it globally.
>
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
> Pieter Vander Vennet
> On 21.06.21 21:08, Matthieu Gaillet wrote:
>> Thanks all for your efforts and comments !
>>
>> That mapcomplete thing is great !! I didn’t know about it.
>>
>> And indeed, the completeness is much better than I thought. I’ll review that and will try to better document all those windmolen ;) Especially the height and power is important to differentiate industrial vs private machines.
>>
>> I think we have all we need to go further now. What should we do in order to motivate people to use it ?
>>
>> Thanks again
>>
>> Matthieu
>>
>>
>>> Le 16 juin 2021 à 22:46, Seppe Santens <seppe.santens at westtoer.be <mailto:seppe.santens at westtoer.be>> a écrit :
>>>
>>> First draft: https://mapcomplete.osm.be?userlayout=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/seppesantens/MapComplete-Themes/main/OpenWindPowerMap/OpenWindPowerMap.json <https://mapcomplete.osm.be/?userlayout=https:/raw.githubusercontent.com/seppesantens/MapComplete-Themes/main/OpenWindPowerMap/OpenWindPowerMap.json>
>>>
>>> Comments welcome! (including a better title fort his theme)
>>>
>>> Van: Seppe Santens <seppe.santens at westtoer.be <mailto:seppe.santens at westtoer.be>>
>>> Verzonden: woensdag 16 juni 2021 17:25
>>> Aan: OpenStreetMap Belgium <talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk-be at openstreetmap.org>>
>>> Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] Missing windmills data ?
>>>
>>> AANDACHT : Dit bericht is afkomstig van een afzender buiten onze organisatie met een gelijkaardige weergavenaam. Klik niet op hyperlinks en open geen bijlages tenzij je de afzender kent en je zeker bent dat de inhoud veilig is.
>>> I’m willing to give it (the MapComplete theme) a shot
>>>
>>> Seppe
>>>
>>> Van: joost schouppe <joost.schouppe at gmail.com <mailto:joost.schouppe at gmail.com>>
>>> Verzonden: woensdag 16 juni 2021 9:57
>>> Aan: OpenStreetMap Belgium <talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk-be at openstreetmap.org>>
>>> Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] Missing windmills data ?
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Colleagues of mine did an analysis of wind generators in the province of Antwerp, and found that OpenStreetMap had only two or three errors (one removed, two missing IIRC) when reviewed in detail.
>>>
>>> In Flanders, we have gotten pretty good response from municipalities when using the MapComplete platform. Maybe we could make a wind generator theme and ask municipalities to check and complete the data?
>>>
>>> Op di 15 jun. 2021 om 19:33 schreef Matthieu Gaillet <matthieu at gaillet.be <mailto:matthieu at gaillet.be>>:
>>>
>>> Salut,
>>>
>>> J’ai récemment lu dans ce papier qu’aucune donnée précise n’était disponible sur le nombre d’éoliennes en Wallonie. https://plus.lesoir.be/378347/article/2021-06-15/eoliennes-les-communes-wallonnes-au-bord-de-la-crise-de-nerfs <https://plus.lesoir.be/378347/article/2021-06-15/eoliennes-les-communes-wallonnes-au-bord-de-la-crise-de-nerfs>
>>>
>>> Ne serait-ce pas l’occasion de mettre la communauté à l’œuvre ?
>>>
>>> Premièrement, remonter localisation des parcs éoliens
>>>
>>> Deuxièmement, faire un relevé sur place
>>>
>>> Troisièmement réunir des informations plus précises sur les hauteurs et les puissances.
>>>
>>> Les communes disposent généralement de ces informations, à priori on pourrait les obtenir sur simple demande. Parfois c’est même décrit sur un panneau informatif.
>>>
>>> En bonus il reste à relever les éoliennes privées, surtout celles autour des exploitations agricoles.
>>>
>>> Qu’en pensez-vous ? Comment démarrer ce genre de community-assisted survey ?
>>>
>>> L’état des lieux : https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/18oI <https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/18oI> - Je vois déjà que le parc sur Assesse est manquant.
>>>
>>> Matthieu
>>>
>>>
>>> Matthieu G. (en mode mobile)
>>>
>>> Matthieu G. (en mode mobile)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-be mailing list
>>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Joost Schouppe
>>> OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
>>> ***DISCLAIMER*** www.westtoer.be/disclaimer <http://www.westtoer.be/disclaimer>***DISCLAIMER*** www.westtoer.be/disclaimer <http://www.westtoer.be/disclaimer>_______________________________________________
>>> Talk-be mailing list
>>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-be mailing list
>> Talk-be at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/attachments/20210622/94f56428/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-be
mailing list