[Talk-ca] Merging OSM + Geobase (summary)

[Bergeron, Guy]

The actual recommendation to NRN provider is to show intersecting dual
carriageways as not intersecting at a single point. Each dual carriage
ways should continue straight as it was done with the other dual
carriage ways intersecting just south of your example. This is just a
recommendation and users may find other intersections as the one in your
example but most of them should not intersect at a single point.

If you are interested in the recommendations for data acquisition that
are provided to NRN providers, go to the following link:

ftp://ftp.ctis.nrcan.gc.ca/pub/information/NRN_V2/Geobase_Best_Practices
_NRN.pdf


Guy

-----Original Message-----
From: talk-ca-bounces at openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-ca-bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of James Ewen
Sent: 6 avril 2009 00:39
To: talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Merging OSM + Geobase (summary)

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:47 PM, James Ewen <ve6srv at gmail.com> wrote:

> GeoBase also like to show intersecting dual carriageways as all
> intersecting at a single point. (Can't find one right now...)

Figured I should back my claims with proof...

http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.54653&lon=-113.29462&zoom=17&layers
=B000FTF

I also just noticed that GeoBase way
UUID:c9b53911fe664beca5fb371bd80b495f is labelled as Bison Way,
although it is actually part of Bethel Way.

GeoBase has quantity data, and with some help from the OSM community,
we can make it quality data as well.

James
VE6SRV

_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca