[Talk-ca] Ontario 040P

[Sam Vekemans]

The address range fields are shown in BC, but just not filled in like
they are in Alberta. ... It isnt being used because we havent found a
way to use it yet.

Hopefully, when i learn how to use geobase2osm, i'll have the answer.

On 6/20/09, Michel Gilbert <michcasa at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> I do not want to put you on a false track but I think the address ranges
> are
> not part of Canvev. I hope Guy will be able to confirm or please you.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michel
>
> 2009/6/20 Sam Vekemans <acrosscanadatrails at gmail.com>
>
>> Would you know when it will be available in the CanVec data?
>>
>> Has anyone thought of how we can make use of the geobase address range
>> data?
>> Does anyone want an .osm file to be made that just has the 4 address
>> range fields (and the proper source tags) made as i go through with
>> canvec2osm?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sam
>>
>>
>> On 6/18/09, Bergeron, Guy <Guy.Bergeron at rncan-nrcan.gc.ca> wrote:
>> > Just a heads up that the next NRN release for Ontario, schedule for
>> > this
>> > summer (around August), will include street names and address ranges
>> > from closest to source NRN providers.
>> >
>> > Guy
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: talk-ca-bounces at openstreetmap.org
>> > [mailto:talk-ca-bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Adam Glauser
>> > Sent: 16 juin 2009 13:10
>> > To: talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>> > Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Ontario 040P
>> >
>> > I've found (and since corrected) a couple more false-positive matches.
>> >
>> > Ways 35518380 was name="Old Oak Place", statscan:rbuid=3357619.  These
>> > tags should actually have been applied to way 35521248.  The correct
>> > tags for the first way are name="Aspenwood Place",
>> > statscan:rbuid=3357613.
>> >
>> > Way 35502496 was name="Willow Wood Drive",statscan:rbuid=3357623.
>> > Should be name="Woodrow Place",statscan:rbuid=3357623.  This is tricky
>> > in part due to one Statscan feature corresponding to two different
>> > Geobase features (the entrance to the cul-de-sac and the
>> > circle-with-middle-barrier part).
>> >
>> > I'll continue to report these unless I hear otherwise - I'm still new
>> > here, if this is just noise please let me know.
>> >
>> > Also, thanks to Steve's pointers about OpenJUMP and the StatsCan road
>> > name data, I've given names to a bunch of ways that Roadmatcher
>> > couldn't
>> >
>> > resolve, along with their StatsCan RB_UIDs, using a combination of the
>> > .shp file from the StatsCan website and local knowledge of the layout
>> > of
>> >
>> > the roads.
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Talk-ca mailing list
>> > Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Talk-ca mailing list
>> > Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Twitter: @Acrosscanada
>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Michel Gilbert
>


-- 
Twitter: @Acrosscanada
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans